On Sat, Mar 24, 2007 at 06:29:56PM -0500, Samuel Bronson wrote: > On 3/24/07, Stefan O'Rear <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > >> The only thing I can think of (besides "nice idea") is that you'd better > >either > >> a) make sure that Cabal always knows about all the extensions supported > >by the > >> compiler > >> or > >> b) provide a workaround for when Cabal does not know about a given > >extension. > > > >We already have this, it's called darcs send. > > > >That said, cabal is very sorely lacking hacker's documentation. I for > >one can't understand the code. (yet (but still I learned lambdabot > >faster)) > > So, how do you compel the people who do compiler releases to ensure > that it is *done*? > > Also, what about the part where you have to wait for another Cabal > release?
I was going to write a nice rebuttal here, but then I remembered I hadn't read the original message well enough. Having done so, I agree with Ian completely. (*Great* idea, I had the same one for the hv system.) Stefan _______________________________________________ cabal-devel mailing list [email protected] http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/cabal-devel
