On Fri, 2007-04-20 at 15:28 +0200, Bertram Felgenhauer wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> I've discussed my previous patch ("add extra-includes field to buildinfo")
> with Duncan and we came to the conclusion that adding a new field is not
> necessary.

Cheers Bertram,

I'll give people a day or two to raise issues about this, otherwise I'm
inclined to apply it.

Duncan

_______________________________________________
cabal-devel mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/cabal-devel

Reply via email to