On Tue, 2007-04-24 at 09:52 +0100, Simon Marlow wrote: > Duncan Coutts wrote: > > Those patches I was talking about. I'd apreciate a review :-) > > Looks fine - although as we talked about on IRC, we should think carefully > about > what sdist is supposed to do, and the difference between Happy/Alex-generated > .hs files and c2hs-generated .hs files. The former should go in an sdist, > but > not the latter.
Indeed. We need to know for each pre-processor if the generated .hs files are platform and implementation independent. As Ross points out, currently we don't do anything about implementation independence, we generate alex & happy .hs files that use ghc extensions and then include them in the sdist tarball. Duncan _______________________________________________ cabal-devel mailing list [email protected] http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/cabal-devel
