Hi Ian,

That's not something that we want to be able to fix with configurations,
though. We need to either implement all the functionality for all the
implementations or to split the package up.

I disagree. I have a library which provides two modules, one for
compilers without multi-parameter type classes, and both for those
with them. I want this to be one library, but I want the modules
exported to vary based on the compiler being used. Since the library
is small, splitting it up would be a big pain.

Thanks

Neil
_______________________________________________
cabal-devel mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/cabal-devel

Reply via email to