Date: Sun, 8 Jul 2007 22:23:25 +0200
> From: Matthias Kilian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: Duncan Coutts <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Cc: [email protected]
> Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: Re: [Haskell] Cabal, Haddock, and the location of documentation
>
> On Sun, Jul 08, 2007 at 06:22:43PM +0100, Duncan Coutts wrote:
> > > I think it'd be perfectly reasonable to follow the lead of
autoconf here
> > > and have slightly finer grained control with respect to the kinds of
> > > files we're installing. Autoconf distinguishes docs (and various
kinds
> > > of docs, html, ps, pdf, man etc) from the generic datadir.
> > >
> > > So yes, if you want to extend cabal in this direction I'm happy to
> > > review patches.
>
> Ok, I'll give it a try, but it'll take a while (a week or two).
> First I've to get all the OpenBSD ports updated (including horrible
> workarounds for the missing docdir option). Everything else would
> be maintainance hell for me ;-)
>
> Anyway, what are the requirements/whishes?
>
> - Just docdir, maybe htmlsubdir or haddocksubdir
> - Or docdir and separate htmldir / haddockdir
> - Something more flexible
>
> Ciao,
> Kili
_______________________________________________
cabal-devel mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/cabal-devel
