In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> "Neil Mitchell" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Hi > > > > m.n.o.* ~~> >= m.n.o && < m.n.(o+1) > > > > I like this. > > Me too. > > > > m - n ~~> >= m && <= n > > I would much prefer m .. n as the syntax, as that is the syntax for > ranges in Haskell.
True, but it looks horrible with version numbers since they're full of '.'s: 1.2.3..4.5.6 ? I guess with our ReadP-based parser that's not ambiguous without whitespace but it's not nice. Duncan _______________________________________________ cabal-devel mailing list cabal-devel@haskell.org http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/cabal-devel
