On Mon, 2008-06-16 at 09:31 -0400, Darrin Thompson wrote: > Is this buggy behavior?
It's certainly a missing feature. > I would guess that what alex and happy have in common is that they are > indirect (second order?) dependencies of the user's specified package. > Pure speculation on my part. Yes, cabal does not use build-tools as dependencies at the moment: http://hackage.haskell.org/trac/hackage/ticket/227 Duncan _______________________________________________ cabal-devel mailing list [email protected] http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/cabal-devel
