On 29 Apr 2010, at 13:18, Ivan Lazar Miljenovic wrote:
Stephen Tetley <[email protected]> writes:
Thanks. As far as the Cabal file goes - CppHs is LGPL, its in the
included README that the GPL distinction is noticed. Possibly this
isn't the clearest way of presenting things...
Well, currently Cabal only lets you specify one license, so your
options
are to either use OtherLicense like Bulat suggested and then specify
in
the License file what's what, or else do as cpphs does.
I suggest submitting a feature request for Cabal: permit separate
licences on each executable stanza.
Regards,
Malcolm
_______________________________________________
cabal-devel mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/cabal-devel
