Yeah, sorry, I am using both cabal and cabal-install HEAD both fetched from darcs last night.
On Mon, Jan 10, 2011 at 8:43 AM, Duncan Coutts <[email protected] > wrote: > On Sun, 2011-01-09 at 19:26 -0600, Thomas Tuegel wrote: > > On Sun, Jan 9, 2011 at 3:53 PM, Daniel Peebles <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > > Which seems odd, since there are 2 test cases (not 0 as the output > claims) > > > and one of them should definitely be failing (it has a False in it). > > > Am I doing something wrong? > > > Duncan and I made the decision to turn off the detailed type in the > > current release because it's not totally ready. You should get a > > warning to that effect when you run 'cabal configure --enable-tests' > > with a detailed-type test. Your tests are not actually passing; > > they're not even running, but Cabal is failing to produce a useful > > error message. This is at the top of my to-do list (though I realize > > that may be little consolation for your wasted time now). > > I think Daniel is actually using Cabal HEAD which has the detailed-0.9 > test type enabled. If one tries that test type with the release > Cabal-1.10 then one does indeed get a warning at configure time. > > The behaviour with Cabal-1.10 is: > > $ cabal configure --enable-tests > Resolving dependencies... > Configuring zlib-0.5.3.1... > Warning: 'detailed-0.9' is not a supported test suite version. > The known test suite types are: exitcode-stdio-1.0 > > $ cabal test > Running 1 test suites... > 0 of 1 test suites (0 of 1 test cases) passed. > > Daniel can you check if you are indeed using Cabal HEAD or not? > > Duncan > >
_______________________________________________ cabal-devel mailing list [email protected] http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/cabal-devel
