On Mon, May 23, 2011 at 4:19 PM, Duncan Coutts <duncan.cou...@googlemail.com> wrote: > So in your other email you suggest a simple attribute system where we > use a set of named tags, but with no meanings that a generic test agent > will know about, just to be used as way for users to filter on tests. > > Then here you've got a few suggestions for attributes with particular > meanings to the test agent. Perhaps that kind of combination is enough, > and we don't need anything to declare any kind of meaning. I think it's > probably worth thinking about this part a bit more though.
I think widely used attribute such as 'size' should be fields in the record while more specific ones such as 'css-tests' should go into tags. If some attributes in tags turns out to be of general enough interest it could be promoted to a record field in a future API version. Johan _______________________________________________ cabal-devel mailing list cabal-devel@haskell.org http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/cabal-devel