(I wish this project was in git so I could just reply to the patch inline ;-)
Regarding this comment in the docs: +For brevity, the example package +does not include a library or any normal executables, but a real package would +be required to have at least one library or executable. is there a technical reason for requiring that the package contain some other library or executable? It seems like it would be useful to allow benchmark-only packages that eg. provide a benchmark of some task that ties together two other library packages (st. the benchmark wouldn't naturally fit into either of those packages), or shootout submissions etc. Conrad. On 25 October 2011 08:59, Johan Tibell <johan.tib...@gmail.com> wrote: > Wed Oct 19 08:32:33 PDT 2011 Johan Tibell <johan.tib...@gmail.com> > * Describe benchmark sections in the user guide > > M ./Cabal/doc/developing-packages.markdown +69 > > View patch online: > http://darcs.haskell.org/cgi-bin/darcsweb.cgi?r=cabal;a=darcs_commitdiff;h=20111019153233-73595-35f643a4cff680aaf6453cbe66090b6b24363770.gz > > > _______________________________________________ > cabal-devel mailing list > cabal-devel@haskell.org > http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/cabal-devel > > _______________________________________________ cabal-devel mailing list cabal-devel@haskell.org http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/cabal-devel
