On Mon, Aug 27, 2012 at 10:35 AM, Mikhail Glushenkov < the.dead.shall.r...@gmail.com> wrote:
> So the idea is that stable always corresponds to the latest stable > release. Yes. > Will there be a branch where active development happens while > master is frozen? I wouldn't think so. I'd just expect people to delay pull requests for a little while during a freeze, to keep things simplest for the people involved. (Yes, we could have three branches instead, but I'd prefer to try the simpler structure to begin with.)
_______________________________________________ cabal-devel mailing list cabal-devel@haskell.org http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/cabal-devel
