On Wed, Sep 5, 2012 at 10:57 AM, Ross Paterson <r...@soi.city.ac.uk> wrote: > That test is copied from Hackage1. We don't have any means of allocating > the module namespace apart from squatter's rights and negotiation, > but arbitrary expansion of the top level of the hierarchy is unhelpful, > and having a warning for that seems to me the least we should do.
I'm not sure I see the problem with arbitrary expansion of the top level of the hierarchy. If the Haskell community has a clear idea of what the module hierarchy is /for/, I'd like to see that discussed formalised in a haskellwiki article. It seems like I'm at least not the only person confused: http://www.reddit.com/r/haskell/comments/zdev6/hierarchical_modules_are_frequently_misused/ _______________________________________________ cabal-devel mailing list cabal-devel@haskell.org http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/cabal-devel
