On Mon, Oct 15, 2012 at 9:34 PM, Mikhail Glushenkov <the.dead.shall.r...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Tue, Oct 16, 2012 at 5:27 AM, Johan Tibell <johan.tib...@gmail.com> wrote: >> Hi, >> >> If we're going to be using sandboxes extensively (I think we should!) >> having each command output the sandbox location is a bit much. Perhaps >> make this line: >> >> Using a sandbox located at /Users/tibbe/src/cassava/.cabal-sandbox >> >> only appear at higher verbosity? > > I'm not against this, but having no indication which mode > (sandbox/"normal") is used might be a bit confusing. > > What about making only sandbox-init print the full path and print > something like "Note: using a sandbox" in other cases?
While a bit shorter, it's still a bit much I think. How about we only try it at higher verbosity levels and if users find it confusing we output it by default? Note that you shouldn't get any strange errors from being inside a sandbox, at most you could get some complaints about dependencies not being installed? _______________________________________________ cabal-devel mailing list cabal-devel@haskell.org http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/cabal-devel
