On Thu, Nov 29, 2012 at 09:01:13AM -0800, Johan Tibell wrote: > On Thu, Nov 29, 2012 at 8:20 AM, Simon Hengel <s...@typeful.net> wrote: > > On Thu, Nov 29, 2012 at 07:54:34AM -0800, Johan Tibell wrote: > >> We may very well end up doing this. There's no rush to make it > >> default. We can make a release with opt-in sandboxes and decide three > >> months later if we want to make it the default. > > > > Nice. > > > > So I guess the idea is that we will have a release candidate (as Mikhail > > suggested). If there are major issues that we can't get fixed before > > the release, we make it opt-in? > > We might make it opt-in in any case, since we cannot really test > everyone's usage patterns. I think what we'll do is to make it opt-in > and at the same time announce our intentions to make it default and > encourage people to try it out for an extended period of time.
Ok, makes sense. I would assume that implying `cabal install --only-dependencies` on `cabal build` is only sane if sandboxing is used. So we would defer that too? Cheers, Simon _______________________________________________ cabal-devel mailing list cabal-devel@haskell.org http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/cabal-devel
