On Mon, Dec 3, 2012 at 1:48 PM, Malcolm Wallace <malcolm.wall...@me.com> wrote:
>
> If the scheme is going to work at all, it must update _every_ version of 
> text-foo that could be affected.
>
> Is that an unrealistic expectation?

It at least demands the process be automatable, but then perhaps
that's already a good idea.

_______________________________________________
cabal-devel mailing list
cabal-devel@haskell.org
http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/cabal-devel

Reply via email to