oops, forgot to link to my example setup.hs https://gist.github.com/cartazio/5842786 there yah go
On Sat, Jun 22, 2013 at 6:09 PM, Carter Schonwald < carter.schonw...@gmail.com> wrote: > I think you can probably set the flags for the it much more nicely via > http://hackage.haskell.org/packages/archive/Cabal/1.16.0.3/doc/html/Distribution-Simple-Program.htmland > the haddockProgram record. > > heres an example Setup.hs that does something very, similar, in this case > making sure that "-pgmc clang" is passed to ghc always. > > that should help! > > The difference is you'll probably want this manipulation to be using the > haddockHook field in > http://hackage.haskell.org/packages/archive/Cabal/1.16.0.3/doc/html/Distribution-Simple.htmlinstead > of the buildHook field. > > I hope that helps! :) > (while you're at it, adding the -pgmc clang thing from my example setup.hs > would probably prevent the funny build errors I was hitting, :) ) > > > On Sat, Jun 22, 2013 at 10:21 AM, Benjamin Scarlet <rol...@greynode.net>wrote: > >> Distribution.Simple.Setup.HaddockFlags(haddockProgramArgs) is a [(String, >> [String])]. What does it mean? >> >> I've got a package with a largish file which makes haddock blow it's >> stack, so it needs ghc rts options. I can do this on the command line with >> +RTS -K32M -RTS. Can I bake it into my package somehow? I'm trying messing >> with the haddock flags in the haddockHook in the package description, but >> I'm not getting the result I want. >> >> Thanks, >> Ben Scarlet >> _______________________________________________ >> cabal-devel mailing list >> cabal-devel@haskell.org >> http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/cabal-devel >> > >
_______________________________________________ cabal-devel mailing list cabal-devel@haskell.org http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/cabal-devel
