Sorry, I read this to quickly as I was in a rush this morning. Sandboxes consider only the global package DB, not the user package DB.
On Wed, Jul 16, 2014 at 11:59 AM, Roman Cheplyaka <r...@ro-che.info> wrote: > This doesn't make sense to me. Can you elaborate? > > * Johan Tibell <johan.tib...@gmail.com> [2014-07-16 10:00:59+0200] > > Right > > > > > > On Wed, Jul 16, 2014 at 9:42 AM, Daniel Trstenjak < > > daniel.trsten...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > > > Hi Johan, > > > > > > On Tue, Jul 15, 2014 at 01:07:17PM +0200, Johan Tibell wrote: > > > > Cabal is allowed to use any version that fullfills the required > bounds. > > > It uses > > > > a heuristic the tends to prefer > > > > > > > > * installed > > > > * newest > > > > * other > > > > > > > > in that order. > > > > > > Just to make it clear, a cabal sandbox build does consider the > installed > > > libraries in the user package database, right? > > > > > > > > > Greetings, > > > Daniel > > > _______________________________________________ > > > cabal-devel mailing list > > > cabal-devel@haskell.org > > > http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/cabal-devel > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > cabal-devel mailing list > > cabal-devel@haskell.org > > http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/cabal-devel > >
_______________________________________________ cabal-devel mailing list cabal-devel@haskell.org http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/cabal-devel
