Sorry Carl I missed your reply... On 3 January 2015 at 02:03, Carl Eyeinsky <eyeins...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Can you explain what you mean, or how would you use it? > > E.g do you mean having the cabal commands as functions, into which you can > pass a directory structure (with file contents included) as data types? > Pretty much yes. Since I believe the code is well written, my feeling is it might not be a huge amount of work though I haven't had time to look into the details. The hardest part might be working out the name of the library unless cabal-install becomes a BinLib package. ;o) I think there are quite a few packages that make use of cabal-install and so yes better and safer to have a library then having always to call out to a subprocess... Jens
_______________________________________________ cabal-devel mailing list cabal-devel@haskell.org http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/cabal-devel
