On Wed, Feb 25, 2015 at 12:21 PM, lennart spitzner <l...@informatik.uni-kiel.de> wrote: > I am not convinced. how does closing ~40 out of ~700 open tickets make > the contributors more effective? that demand exceeds resources is > true, but it is no argument for closing issues. many of the issues > represent sensible ideas for features that do not need new feedback.
That's 5.7% of our total open bugs. Not bad for an afternoon's work! Let me play devil's advocate here: Why should we keep *any* of the old bugs open? If the bug/feature wasn't important enough to get fixed/implemented since the GitHub migration (more than 2 years ago!), what is ever going to change? -- Thomas Tuegel _______________________________________________ cabal-devel mailing list cabal-devel@haskell.org http://mail.haskell.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cabal-devel
