Sounds good to me. On Wednesday, 15 April 2015, Luite Stegeman <stege...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I think that would be ok. But I'd like to get the version number of the > 1.22 branch bumped and update the Cabal submodule in GHC so I can run more > tests as early as possible and perhaps avoid more embarassing bugs like > this. > > Would it be ok if I bumped the 1.22 branch (to 1.22.3.0 ?). Then when you > roll the release we can just update the submodule again. > > luite > > > On Wed, Apr 15, 2015 at 3:18 PM, Ryan Thomas <r...@ryant.org > <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','r...@ryant.org');>> wrote: > >> Hey Luite, >> >> I can do one but unfortunately I'm in Vietnam without any of my keys >> until Sunday. If it can wait until then I would be happy to do it when I >> return home. >> >> Cheers, >> >> Ryan >> >> >> On Wednesday, 15 April 2015, Luite Stegeman <stege...@gmail.com >> <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','stege...@gmail.com');>> wrote: >> >>> Hi all, >>> >>> Unfortunately GHC 7.10.1 shipped with a Cabal library that handles >>> ghcjs-pkg version numbers wrong, making it unusable to boot GHCJS. >>> >>> I'd like 7.10.2 to ship with a working version (7.10.2 itself also >>> contains an important bugfix for GHCJS), which would require a new minor >>> version release. Can we do one soon? Let me know if I can do anything to >>> help! >>> >>> luite >>> >>> >
_______________________________________________ cabal-devel mailing list cabal-devel@haskell.org http://mail.haskell.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cabal-devel
