On Tue, Apr 28, 2015 at 4:40 PM Gershom B <gersh...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > In that case, perhaps we really should lean only towards the “shell out” > solution. Or, I suppose, we could hide the ssl implementation behind a flag > — but that feels rather awkward in comparison. > > So let’s try this: can anybody suggest any _downside_ to the “shell out” > solution? > > > Since I wasn't explicit (and my comments could be read to say otherwise): I am +1 on whatever approach ends up getting SSL support into cabal. If the least problematic approach ends up being "shell out", I'm OK with it (I even did that myself[1] in the distant past). I believe that shelling out would work for uploading as well as downloading, correct? Michael [1] http://hackage.haskell.org/package/http-wget
_______________________________________________ cabal-devel mailing list cabal-devel@haskell.org http://mail.haskell.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cabal-devel
