On 07/03/2015 11:44 PM, Mikhail Glushenkov wrote: > Hi, > > On 3 July 2015 at 18:09, Bardur Arantsson <s...@scientician.net> wrote: >> The checks rely on information which the sub-commands will use (or will >> have to look up a second time)... hence I want to store it in UseSandbox :). > > Yeah, so you can do the check in loadConfigOrSandboxConfig and then > put the result of it in the UseSandbox value that you return. >
(Sorry, think I did a personal reply instead of reply-to-list. Here it is again for the rest of you...) Exactamundo. I take it there's no objections on the ground of "but UseSandbox MUST ..."? I took that sentinment from your first post. It'll probably be easier to evaluate these things properly when I produce actual pull req's. Regards, _______________________________________________ cabal-devel mailing list cabal-devel@haskell.org http://mail.haskell.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cabal-devel
