I doubt this list has good coverage. You probably should try haskell-cafe? Another way to put this question:
Is anybody is still using GHC 6.x? Cheers, Oleg > On 09 Nov 2015, at 06:29, Bardur Arantsson <s...@scientician.net> wrote: > > Hi all, > > Just to get input from as many people as possible: I was pondering a > plan for modularizing the solver[1] and wanted to reach as many people > as possible with my question: > > Is anybody is still using the top-down solver? > > Please respond to this list if you are, especially if you're doing so > because there's no other way to get the modular solver to do what you > want. (Obviously, I'm not promising to fix any problems you may have > with the modular solver, but it would be valuable information since it > could affect the decision of whether we have to keep the top-down solver > around.) > > Regards, > > -- > [1] https://github.com/haskell/cabal/pull/2768#issuecomment-154917165 > > _______________________________________________ > cabal-devel mailing list > cabal-devel@haskell.org > http://mail.haskell.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cabal-devel >
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
_______________________________________________ cabal-devel mailing list cabal-devel@haskell.org http://mail.haskell.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cabal-devel
