Thanks Kaarle. It's now available on the web site ! -Vincent ----- Original Message ----- From: "Kaarle Kaila" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Cactus Developers List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Monday, November 12, 2001 9:32 PM Subject: Re: html interface for Cactus (JUnitEE)
> > > > > > Vincent wrote on > > > Tuesday, October 30, 2001 10:22 AM > > > > > > > > > >Here is what I suggest (if you wish, of course !) : Why don't you write a > > > >web page about how to set up Cactus and JUnitEE so that one can use > >junitee > > > >as a test runner ? Submit this to this list and I'll publish it to the > > > >cactus web site for you. > > > > > > Hi! > > > >thanks. Could you send the corresponding xml file ... or post it somewhere ? > >:) > > Hello again, > > I've composed a Howto_junitee xml-file into the attachment. > I did not find the command to create the html-files from > these so I have not been able to verify it other that manually > and that it is well-defined. IE5 did not accept the dtd so > I could not check if it's valid. > > > > > > > > Is this how you meant? It could be among the other how_to links! > > > >Yes, this is exactly how I meant and yes it could be among the howto links > >! :). Thanks ! > > > >There are just slight modifications that I'd like to bring to the page : > >- be more generic and not only give explanation for JspTestCase and > >JspRedirector > > I agree that I should have done this in a differnet way but I have > not yet had time to learn more about this. > > > >- remove the note for weblogic 5.1 as it is only one way of doing it (not my > >preferred way btw :-)) or rather say to put the junitee.jar in the same > >location as where the cactus jars are put. > > I removed this. > > >- explain that the idea is to run the client side part of cactus inside the > >container > > I think this was already there > > > >- explain why you would want to use junitEE ? The 2 reasons mentionned do > >not seem to be an enough good reason for using junitee. Could we say that > >the real reason would be when you want to try cactus quickly and are not > >concerned with automating unit testing ? > >- say clearly that usage of standard junit testrunner (textui, swingui, ...) > >will not be possible if cactus is configured this way and thus the ant junit > >task cannot be used to automate the test > > These I added. > > >- explain the full configuration : describe a full cactus war/ear with > >directories and what to put in them > > weblogic 5.1 is not very good with war/ear and I have not yet > had time to dig deeper into it. > > This xml file is what I can now suggest. I am preparing an inhouse > course on junit with topics like junit - junitee - cactus and if you have > any suggestions on material that I can use I would appreciate. > > If you feel like modifying something you are of course wellcome to do that. > > regards > Kaarle > > >Thanks again > >-Vincent > > Kaarle Kaila > http://www.iki.fi/kaila > mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > tel: +358 50 3725844 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- ---- > -- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
