vmassol 02/04/21 08:20:49
Modified: documentation/docs/xdocs testedon.xml
Log:
added a section for known issues with containers
Revision Changes Path
1.8 +101 -0 jakarta-cactus/documentation/docs/xdocs/testedon.xml
Index: testedon.xml
===================================================================
RCS file: /home/cvs/jakarta-cactus/documentation/docs/xdocs/testedon.xml,v
retrieving revision 1.7
retrieving revision 1.8
diff -u -r1.7 -r1.8
--- testedon.xml 21 Apr 2002 14:41:26 -0000 1.7
+++ testedon.xml 21 Apr 2002 15:20:49 -0000 1.8
@@ -12,8 +12,30 @@
<body>
+ <s1 title="What containers has Cactus been tested on ?">
+
+ <ul>
+ <li>
+ <jump anchor="tested_on">Tested on ...</jump>
+ </li>
+ <li>
+ <jump anchor="fails_on">Fails on ...</jump>
+ </li>
+ </ul>
+
+ </s1>
+
+ <anchor id="tested_on"/>
<s1 title="Tested on ...">
+ <note>
+ Cactus is supposed to work on any J2EE 1.2 and 1.3 compliant servers.
+ However, we have found in the past that some containers were displaying
+ some weird behaviours (and that there were also bugs in Cactus that
+ were making it non 100% spec-compliant - we have corrected all of these
+ and are not aware of any problem at this time).
+ </note>
+
<p>
This page shows the different versions of servers that have been
reported to work fine with Cactus. By working we mean that the Cactus
@@ -268,10 +290,89 @@
<link href="mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]">Vincent Massol</link>
</td>
</tr>
+ <tr>
+ <td>
+ Orion
+ </td>
+ <td>
+ 1.5.2
+ </td>
+ <td>
+ 1.2
+ </td>
+ <td>
+ <link href="mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]">Vincent Massol</link>
+ </td>
+ </tr>
+ <tr>
+ <td>
+ Orion
+ </td>
+ <td>
+ 1.5.2
+ </td>
+ <td>
+ 1.3
+ </td>
+ <td>
+ <link href="mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]">Vincent Massol</link>
+ </td>
+ </tr>
</table>
</s2>
+
+ </s1>
+
+ <anchor id="fails_on"/>
+ <s1 title="Fails on ...">
+
+ <p>
+ Some containers have some issues which prevent them from running the
+ Cactus sample application tests.
+ </p>
+
+ <table>
+ <tr>
+ <th>
+ Server
+ </th>
+ <th>
+ Version
+ </th>
+ <th>
+ J2EE API
+ </th>
+ <th>
+ Reason
+ </th>
+ <th>
+ Submitted by
+ </th>
+ </tr>
+ <tr>
+ <td>
+ Enhydra
+ </td>
+ <td>
+ 3.3.1 b1
+ </td>
+ <td>
+ 1.2
+ </td>
+ <td>
+ Enhydra does not seem to support BASIC authentication as defined
+ by the Servlet specifications and thus the Sample tests which use
+ security fail. All other tests run fine and thus if you don't need
+ to test secure code, you should be fine with Enhydra 3.3.1 b1.
+ </td>
+ <td>
+ <link href="mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]">Vincent Massol</link>
+ </td>
+ </tr>
+
+ </table>
</s1>
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>