> -----Original Message----- > From: Christopher Lenz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: 21 January 2003 23:13 > To: Cactus Developers List > Subject: Re: cvs commit: jakarta-cactus/documentation/docs/xdocs index.xml > > Vincent Massol wrote: > > Hi Chris, > > > >>-----Original Message----- > >>From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > >>Sent: 18 January 2003 13:05 > >>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >>Subject: cvs commit: jakarta-cactus/documentation/docs/xdocs index.xml > >> > >>cmlenz 2003/01/18 05:04:38 > >> > >> Modified: documentation/docs/xdocs index.xml > >> Log: > >> - Change <section name="..."> to <section title="..."> to match the > > rest > >> of the docs > > > > hum... I had put "name" instead of "title" to be closer to the Maven > > xdoc DTD. No worries, we can always change it back later, once we move > > to Maven, if need be... :-) > > The reason for this change was that all other sections used the title > attribute after my find&replace-migration from s1/s2/s3 to section. I > have a full DTD for the docs in the pipeline (based on forrest, but > altered to match the current Cactus docs). I'd prefer to change the > attribute back to "name" when validation against the DTD is in place, so > that errors can be found more easily.
No problem. Again, there is nothing urgent here at all! > > >> - Remove link around figure, doesn't work with printed docs and > > > > isn't > > > >> allowed by the experimental DTD I'm using locally > > > > > > I would like to keep the link around the figure as I think it is very > > logical. Is it possible to put it back and find a way for the printed > > doc to work? > > > > [snip] > > Hmm, how about a simple textual link underneath the image? I think that > would also make it clearer where the link is taking you to. > > The main reason for removing the link was that it didn't fit with the > DTD I'm using, which enforces a clean separation between "block" and > "inline" content, thus making support for multiple target formats easier. > > If you feel a textual link wouldn't be good enough, I can probably find > a way around the conflict with the DTD. I'd prefer a link on the image (from a user point of view) but don't worry. DO not spend much time on this for now. I'd much rather see the printed doc output! :-) Thanks -Vincent -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
