Hi Nick, I think this is something that needs to be decided *together* (i.e. all cactus committers). This is certainly not our current policy (which is why it wasn't in the checkstyle.xml).
Can you please revert ASAP and document your private methods until we decide we want to drop private method comments? Thanks -Vincent > -----Original Message----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: 22 June 2003 05:39 > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: cvs commit: jakarta-cactus checkstyle.xml > > ndlesiecki 2003/06/21 20:38:46 > > Modified: . checkstyle.xml > Log: > allowed Javadocless private methods > > Revision Changes Path > 1.17 +1 -1 jakarta-cactus/checkstyle.xml > > Index: checkstyle.xml > =================================================================== > RCS file: /home/cvs/jakarta-cactus/checkstyle.xml,v > retrieving revision 1.16 > retrieving revision 1.17 > diff -u -r1.16 -r1.17 > --- checkstyle.xml 26 May 2003 12:26:38 -0000 1.16 > +++ checkstyle.xml 22 Jun 2003 03:38:46 -0000 1.17 > @@ -101,7 +101,7 @@ > <property name="versionFormat" value="\$Id.*\$"/> > </module> > <module name="JavadocMethod"> > - <property name="scope" value="private"/> > + <property name="scope" value="protected"/> > <property name="allowUndeclaredRTE" value="true"/> > </module> > <module name="JavadocVariable"> > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
