> -----Original Message----- > From: Christopher Lenz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: 27 December 2003 13:47 > To: Cactus Developers List > Subject: Re: [Vote/Action plan/Feedback] Cactus2 > > Hi Vincent! > > Am 24.12.2003 um 12:21 schrieb Vincent Massol: > > Hi cactus committers, > > > > As every day goes by, I am more and more excited about Cactus v2 (see > > http://blogs.codehaus.org/people/vmassol/archives/ > > 000520_cactus_v2_archi > > tecture_proposal.html). I'd like to start pumping some cactus v2 code. > > > > Before going on, I'd like to know what you think about Cactus v2 and to > > decide on how we progress. I believe we have several options: > > > > 1/ create a jakarta-cactus/sandbox/cactus2 directory and write cactus > > v2 > > code in there > > 2/ request the creation of a jakarta-cactus2 CVS module (It will still > > be under the umbrella of the Cactus project - it's not the creation of > > a > > new project). > > > > I personally much prefer solution 2/ as it is cleaner (and it works > > better with Eclipse projects too). > > I don't see the advantage of a separate CVS module at this stage. I'd > much prefer the code being bootstrapped in a scratchpad area of our > current CVS module. When the code is working and we (the Cactus > community) agree that the proposed architecture is the way to go for > V2, a fresh CVS module would be nice. > > -1 to a jakarta-cactus2 CVS module at this point in time. > +1 to jakarta-cactus/scratchpad/cactus2
ok done (http://cvs.apache.org/viewcvs.cgi/jakarta-cactus/scratchpad/cactus2/) > > When the new code is ready to be promoted out of the scratchpad, we > might also want to consider starting the new repository in SVN. > <http://cvs.apache.org/viewcvs.cgi/?root=Apache-SVN> good idea. I'd love to try SVN... > > > We have also the option to request the creation of a > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list. If not, then all traffic > > will go to the existing cactus-dev ML. I also prefer to request the > > creation of such a list. > > Strong -1 against a new mailing list. Really, our current dev list is > rather low-traffic, we can definitely handle any extra traffic caused > by the new aspect-based cactus. On the negative side, a new mailing > list effectively splits the community, and may raise oversight > concerns. > > Just keep everything on this mailing-list, I'm sure everyone is > interested (I am, at least) :-) cool. I hope that we'll get some feedback now that the architecture and code are open to everyone! Please have architecture discussions on the list and/or on wiki: http://wiki.apache.org/jakarta-cactus/Cactus2Proposal > > > I'm also curious to know how many of you are interested in > > participating > > to Cactus 2 (or is it too early at this stage for you to know)? I've > > been talking to Jonas Boner (AspectWerkz author) and Chad Woolley > > (VirtualMock author) and I'd like to invite them to participate to the > > Cactus2 project if they're interested (it will be easier to do if we > > have separate jakarta-cactus2 CVS module I think). > > > > Anyway, I'm interested in any feedback you have! > > > > Please provide feedback on the proposed Cactus2 architecture. I'd like > > to put this doc in the new cactus2 CVS location so that everyone can > > help and it'll be easier to follow changes to it. > > I'm very interested, but not sure I can be of much help. Besides time > constraints, I'm also (still!) new to aspect-oriented programming. The > document you wrote up definitely sounds cool, though. > > For documentation, I'd suggest we start in the Wiki (wiki.apache.org, > the new, moin-moin based one). A Wiki is probably a better fit for > documenting ideas that are still in a rather early stage. Done: http://wiki.apache.org/jakarta-cactus/Cactus2Proposal Thanks -Vincent --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
