On Fri, 2005-04-22 at 19:13 +0200, Vincent Massol wrote:
> A very small detail: one of the best practices I've been using is to name > the expected exception "expected". I think it makes it a little more > readable. I know, I've been following that practice recently too (more specifically, since I read it on the JUnit Book :-) But in this case, I just copied and pasted a test case from the same file and changed the logic. So, I didn't realize the exception's name (and even if I did I probably wouldn't change it, unless I had changed all testcases). -- Felipe -- Felipe Leme <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Falcon Informática --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
