[ 
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CACTUS-211?page=comments#action_64688 ]
     
Vincent Massol commented on CACTUS-211:
---------------------------------------

The only case I have found the usage of maven.compile.src.set useful is for 
source code generation. So yes, there is a valid use case if someone generates 
Cactus tests. I just hope that people won't use it in other weird use cases 
that go against the Maven philosophy... ;-)

Please go ahead. Thanks.

PS: I don't understand your reason for not having a multi-project... ;-) I've 
done that several times and it works just fine. For example, I don't understand 
why the common project couldn't be a jar, etc.



> Support multiple source directories
> -----------------------------------
>
>          Key: CACTUS-211
>          URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CACTUS-211
>      Project: Cactus
>         Type: Improvement
>   Components: Maven Integration
>     Versions: 1.7
>     Reporter: Felipe Leme
>     Assignee: Felipe Leme
>      Fix For: 1.8

>
> Cactus should allow tests to be defined in multiple directories. Although 
> this is against the "Maven way", tha maven-java-plugin allows that, so Cactus 
> should mimic its behaviour.
> Right now, the source is defined using the following Ant task:
>   <ant:src path="${cactus.src.dir}"/>
> While on maven-java-plugin it is slightly different:
>  <ant:src>
>    <ant:path refid="maven.compile.src.set"/>
>  </ant:src>
> I will write some test cases for this improvment and then committ the changes 
> (hopefully on time for 1.7.1).
> -- Felipe

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators:
   http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/Administrators.jspa
-
For more information on JIRA, see:
   http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to