Hmmm, am I missing something here? I have the following code:
private Flyer createFlyer(Integer id, String name, String msg) throws
Exception {
FlyerHome home = getHome();
Flyer flyer = home.create(id, name, msg);
return flyer;
}
private FlyerHome getHome() throws Exception{
Context init = new InitialContext();
Context cmp = (Context)init.lookup("java:comp/env/bull");
return (FlyerHome) cmp.lookup("FlyerBean");
}
That is executed as part of my testXXX methods, and it works just fine
without any other proxies or classfile editing... In fact I was just about
to write the list favoring IC testing because of the transparent support of
things like JNDI and connection pooling when tests are run in the container.
For instance Resin-CMP has advanced support for EJB 2.0, something which
would be a large project to write MockObjects for, but if I use cactus to
run the tests in-container, I can test that my code works when integrated
with the container's services.
Anyway that's my 2 cents.
Cheers,
Nick
-----Original Message-----
From: Phil Magill [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, July 26, 2001 4:21 AM
To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Subject: RE: [Announcement] Mock Object project
Its import to learn something new everyday....................
-----Original Message-----
From: Alex Fern�ndez [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 26 July 2001 12:23
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [Announcement] Mock Object project
Funny thing then.
I learned something new by misreading your mail :)
Alex.
Phil Magill wrote:
>
> Nope
>
> Its just a class, that in the constructor creates the EJB and each public
> method of the class calls the same method on the bean, simple. That way
the
> Servletredirector can match up the methods in the testXXXXXX methods.
>
> Hope this helps...
>
> Phil
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Alex Fern�ndez [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: 26 July 2001 12:14
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [Announcement] Mock Object project
>
> Yeah, I understand you're talking about the java.lang.reflect.Proxy
> class, right?
>
> Phil Magill wrote:
> > Just a note, the Proxy Objects are just wrapper classes for the EJB.
They
> > are not part of Cactus, only a name i give to them to make them sound
> good.
