Yes, I set up my environment according to the tutorial on the web site.
It's strange becuase I can run the tests and they work great, but only if I
add the methods individually in the suite() method. I think I will try in
Websphere and see what happens. If anyone else has experienced this, let
me know.
Thanks,
David J Mehi
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
(248) 355-6621
"Vincent
Massol" To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
<vmassol@octo. cc:
com> Subject: Re: VAJ 3.5. Class loader
problem
09/10/2001
01:34 PM
Please respond
to cactus-user
Hi David,
Several on this list had succeeded in using Cacus with VAJava 3.5.3 (using
the "return new TestSuite(TestSampleServlet.class);" construction). I guess
your problem is more a classpath issue somewhere. Have you had a look at
the
VAJava tutorial on the Cactus web site ?
Thanks
-Vincent
----- Original Message -----
From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, September 10, 2001 2:47 PM
Subject: VAJ 3.5. Class loader problem
> Hello,
>
> I've been having a similar problem with the class loader as well in VAJ
> 3.5.3. I traced through the code and found that the test class cannot
find
> itself!
>
> If my test class extends the class "TestCase" instead of
"ServletTestCase",
> then it works. In my suite() method, if I add each method individually,
> then it works fine. However, for some reason, JUnit cannot find all my
> "test" methods via reflection when extending the "ServletTestCase" class.
>
> TestSuite suite = new TestSuite();
> suite.addTest( new TestSampleServlet("testGetMethod") );
> suite.addTest( new TestSampleServlet("testPostMethod") );
> .......
> return suite;
>
> instead of
>
> return new TestSuite(TestSampleServlet.class); // JUnit can't find all
> methods via relfection when extending "ServletTestCase"
>
> JUnit provides the error:
> Failed to invoke suite():java.lang.NoClassDefFoundError
>
> But it seems like it can't find the "ServletTestCase", which is the
actual
> test class. It might be something with the VAJ JVM. Does anyone know
what
> could be causing this? It works fine by added the individual methods,
but
> if I have a lot of methods, I would rather just be able to add via
> reflection.
>
> Thanks for your reply,
>
> David J Mehi
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> (248) 355-6621
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
****************************************************************************
>
> The information contained in this transmission, which may be
> confidential and proprietary, is only for the intended recipients.
> Unauthorized use is strictly prohibited. If you receive this
> transmission in error, please notify me immediately by telephone
> or electronic mail and confirm that you deleted this transmission
> and the reply from your electronic mail system.
>
****************************************************************************
>
>
>
>
****************************************************************************
The information contained in this transmission, which may be
confidential and proprietary, is only for the intended recipients.
Unauthorized use is strictly prohibited. If you receive this
transmission in error, please notify me immediately by telephone
or electronic mail and confirm that you deleted this transmission
and the reply from your electronic mail system.
****************************************************************************
