Hi Michael, That's good news. I have to check for 1/ what's the correct behaviour (you may have found a bug!).
For 2/ this is real weird and I don't believe Cactus should be changed. But we need to understand what's the reason ... I'm waiting for your logs. Thanks -Vincent > -----Original Message----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: 04 July 2002 21:14 > To: Cactus Users List > Subject: Re: Cactus and BroadVision 6.0? > > Hi Vincent, > > I have solved most of the problems. Of the 39 "unit" tests in > sample-servlet, 36 are running, with 1 failure and two errors. I will send > you new log files come Monday. Of the 19 "sample" tests, 18 are running > with > 1 failure. > I actually had to change about 8 lines in the Cactus sources: > > 1) When you create a cookie with only a name and a value, Cactus adds > "localhost" for the domain. This caused a matching failure because on the > testing machine, this didn't match the value from getDomain(); I simply > handled this case like if no domain was supplied at all (just set the > cookie > domain to the value of getDomain()); > > 2) For returning results to the client, Cactus uses a Writer; this - for > some unknown reason - doesn't work with BV - now I'm using the > OutputStream, > and it's working (although OutputStream/Writer both work in the tests... > weird). > > Thanks for your help so far, > > Michael > > > -- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:cactus-user- > [EMAIL PROTECTED]> > For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:cactus-user- > [EMAIL PROTECTED]> -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
