Hi Vincent,

All too glad to have helped out!!

Regards,
-Larry

On Fri, 30 Aug 2002 19:25:08 +0100
  "Vincent Massol" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Hi Larry,
>
>You have discovered a very nasty bug that was introduced 
>in Cactus 1.4.
>I have fixed it and will deliver a new Cactus 1.4.1 
>version very soon
>(I'll try for this week end). In any case it will be in 
>tomorrow nightly
>build.
>
>Thanks a lot for your help in improving Cactus
>-Vincent
>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Larry Tambascio [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
>> Sent: 29 August 2002 20:23
>> To: Cactus Users List
>> Subject: Re: request parameters MIA
>> 
>> I've attached a test case that illustrates my problem. 
>> I
>> don't understand why it's failing.  Am I missing some
>> concept or is this a bug??  I really doubt it's a bug, 
>>as
>> I don't think anyone else has posted a similar problem.
>> 
>> Thanks in advance!!
>> -Larry
>> 
>> On Thu, 29 Aug 2002 14:13:25 -0400
>>   "Larry Tambascio" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> >I figure it's gotta be me.
>> >
>> >In my beginXxx method I add four parameters to the
>> >request object.  I examined them all in the debugger, 
>>and
>> >they all look great.  In my setUp method, however, I do
>> >the following:
>> >
>> >    System.out.println("setUp parameters=" +
>> >request.getParameterMap ());
>> >
>> >and it spits out this:
>> >
>> >setUp
>> >parameters={Cactus_TestMethod=[Ljava.lang.String;@78d244,
>> >CurrentView=[Ljava.lang.String;@348b11,
>> >Cactus_TestClass=[Ljava.lang.String;@162212,
>> >Cactus_AutomaticSession=[Ljava.lang.String;@16daa9,
>> >ProMVCURI=[Ljava.lang.String;@6d999a,
>> >Cactus_Service=[Ljava.lang.String;@7f4fbb}
>> >
>> >Only 2 of the 4 I added in beginXxx made it to the 
>>setUp
>> >method (CurrentView and ProMVCURI).  Needless to say, 
>>my
>> >test from that point crashes and burns.  Curiously, the
>> >two parameters that did make it to this point were the
>> >2nd and 4th parameters added.  Just thought I'd throw
>> >that in there to increase the weirdness factor.
>> >
>> >Has anyone else observed this behavior (I'm using 
>>version
>> >13-1.4)??  Does anyone have a clue as to what I'm
>> >possibly doing wrong??
>> >
>> >--
>> >To unsubscribe, e-mail:
>> >  <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> >For additional commands, e-mail:
>> ><mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> >
>
>
>
>--
>To unsubscribe, e-mail: 
>  <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>For additional commands, e-mail: 
><mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>


--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:   <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

Reply via email to