... and one more :(

      <action dev="VMA" type="fix" due-to="Micah Williams"
due-to-email="[EMAIL PROTECTED]">
        Fixed bug where <code>NullPointerException</code> would be
thrown by Cactus
        <code>ServletTestRunner</code> if an exception raised in a test
case had not
        specified a message (i.e. <code>getMessage()</code> returning 
        <code>null</code>).
      </action>

I hope it is the last one ...

Thanks
-Vincent

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Vincent Massol [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: 31 August 2002 15:46
> To: 'Cactus Users List'; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: Cactus 1.4.1 release - Anything else?
> 
> And the following one:
> 
>       <action dev="VMA" type="fix" due-to="Gerhard Kreutzer"
> due-to-email="[EMAIL PROTECTED]">
>         Some JDK implementation return "null" when
> Class.getClassLoader() is
>         called to indicate that the given class has been loaded by the
>         bootstrap class loader. This was leading to
>         <code>NullPointerException</code> being thrown by Cactus in
some
>         cases.
>       </action>
> 
> Anything more?
> 
> Thanks
> -Vincent
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Vincent Massol [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > Sent: 30 August 2002 21:18
> > To: 'Cactus Users List'; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Subject: RE: Cactus 1.4.1 release - Anything else?
> >
> > I have just added the following one too:
> >
> >       <action dev="VMA" type="fix" due-to="Ville Skytt�"
> > due-to-email="[EMAIL PROTECTED]">
> >         Fixed import bug in sample-servlet which prevented building
> > Cactus
> >         from the sources on JDK 1.4.
> >       </action>
> >
> > Thanks
> > -Vincent
> >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: Vincent Massol [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > > Sent: 30 August 2002 20:57
> > > To: 'Cactus Users List'; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > Subject: Cactus 1.4.1 release - Anything else?
> > >
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > I'd like to release version 1.4.1 of Cactus over this week end. It
> > > corrects the following bugs (2 minor and 1 major). Do you know any
> > other
> > > bug that you would like fixed in that version ?
> > >
> > >    <release version="1.4.1" date="31 August 2002">
> > >       <action dev="VMA" type="fix" due-to="Hirsch Richard"
> > > due-to-email="[EMAIL PROTECTED]">
> > >         Fixed default properties for the sample application so
that
> it
> > > points
> > >         to the correct HttpClient jar which is packaged with
Cactus
> > (the
> > > one
> > >         built on 06/06/2002).
> > >       </action>
> > >       <action dev="VMA" type="fix" due-to="Larry Tambascio"
> > > due-to-email="[EMAIL PROTECTED]">
> > >         Fixed a bug that was preventing having several POST
> parameters
> > > added in
> > >         the request in <code>beginXXX()</code> methods.
> > >       </action>
> > >       <action dev="VMA" type="fix" due-to="Dave Hoover"
> > > due-to-email="[EMAIL PROTECTED]">
> > >         The encoding in the sample <code>junit-noframes</code> XSL
> > >         stylesheet was set to be "US-ASCII". It is now set to
> "UTF-8".
> > >         Apparently, XSLT processors are only required to support
> utf-8
> > >         and utf-16, the rest is processor specific. For example
your
> > >         processor might spupport US-ASCII-7 and others might
support
> > >         US-ASCII. Thanks to Robert Koberg for the explanation!
> > >       </action>
> > >     </release>
> > >
> > > Thanks
> > > -Vincent
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > To unsubscribe, e-mail:   <mailto:cactus-user-
> > > [EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:cactus-user-
> > > [EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail:   <mailto:cactus-user-
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:cactus-user-
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> 
> 
> 
> --
> To unsubscribe, e-mail:   <mailto:cactus-user-
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:cactus-user-
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]>



--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:   <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

Reply via email to