Hi Qinxian, I agree for unit testing MBeans themselves. However, how do you write the following with pure JUnit?
"unit testing a method that registers an MBean against the MBean server of WebLogic (for example)" You need a way to get inside the app server for that. -Vincent > -----Original Message----- > From: Qingxian Wang [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: 24 September 2002 10:47 > To: 'Cactus Users List' > Subject: RE: MBeans with Junit > > In my experience, JUnit is sufficient for MBean integration test. It is > similar to write normal test cases. > > Qingxian > > -----Original Message----- > From: Prabodh Goel [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: 24 September 2002 10:26 > To: Cactus Users List > Subject: RE: MBeans with Junit > > > > Hi Vincent, > > I want to write integration unit tests with Mbean (JMX > stuff). If it is possible with just junit, then why I > should go for Cactus as you said it is better. > Kindly explain > > Thanks > - Prabodh > > --- Vincent Massol <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Hi Prabodh, > > > > As you know MBeans are simply java beans. As such > > they be unit tested > > with JUnit (no need for Cactus). > > > > Now, if you want to write integration unit tests > > like unit testing a > > method that registers an MBean against the MBean > > server of WebLogic (for > > exemple), then Cactus is a good choice. > > > > -Vincent > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > From: Prabodh Goel [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > > Sent: 24 September 2002 08:09 > > > To: Cactus Users List > > > Subject: MBeans with Junit > > > > > > > > > Hi > > > > > > Can we use Junit Framework ( *not* Cactus) to unit > > > test MBeans or JMX related stuff ? > > > > > > Thanks > > > Prabodh > > > > > > > > > __________________________________________________ > > > Do you Yahoo!? > > > New DSL Internet Access from SBC & Yahoo! > > > http://sbc.yahoo.com > > > > > > -- > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:cactus-user- > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > For additional commands, e-mail: > > <mailto:cactus-user- > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > > > > > > -- > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: > > <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > For additional commands, e-mail: > > <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > > > __________________________________________________ > Do you Yahoo!? > New DSL Internet Access from SBC & Yahoo! > http://sbc.yahoo.com > > -- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: > <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > For additional commands, e-mail: > <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > This e-mail and any files transmitted with it are confidential and > intended > solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom it is addressed. If > you have received this e-mail in error you must not copy, distribute or > take > any action in reliance on it. Please notify the sender by e-mail or > telephone. > We utilise an anti-virus system and therefore any files sent via e-mail > will > have been checked for known viruses. You are however advised to run your > own > virus check before opening any attachments received as we will not in any > event accept any liability whatsoever once an e-mail and/or any attachment > is received. Any views expressed by an individual within this e-mail do > not > necessarily reflect the views of Systems Union Group plc or any of its > subsidiary companies. > > > -- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:cactus-user- > [EMAIL PROTECTED]> > For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:cactus-user- > [EMAIL PROTECTED]> -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
