Don't forget MockDoclet. http://joe.truemesh.com/mockdoclet/
I've never used it but it looks *very* promising. Cheers, nick Nicholas Lesiecki Principal Software Engineer eBlox, Inc. (520) 615-9345 x104 Check out my new book!: Java Tools for Extreme Programming: Mastering Open Source Tools, including Ant, JUnit, and Cactus http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ASIN/047120708X/ Check out my articles on AspectJ: Test flexibly with AspectJ and mock objects: http://www-106.ibm.com/developerworks/java/library/j-aspectj2/?loc=j Introduction to AspectJ http://www-106.ibm.com/developerworks/library/j-aspectj/index.htmlloc=dwmain > -----Original Message----- > From: Prabodh Goel [mailto:prabodhgoel@;yahoo.com] > Sent: Friday, November 08, 2002 2:14 AM > To: Cactus Users List > Subject: RE: Junit vs JUnitDoclet vs Jtest > > > > Hi Vincent, > > Thanks for the info. I will have look at Mock Objects > before reaching any conclusion > > regards, > Prabodh > > > --- Vincent Massol <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Prabodh, > > > > I believe JUnitDoclet only generates empty > > skeletons. You still need to > > put the meat (JUnitDoclet is not a testing > > framework). Do you find > > writing this tedious: > > > > public class TestXXX extends TestCase > > { > > public testYYY() > > { > > } > > } > > > > (this is with the new JUnit 3.8.1 syntax) > > > > That said, EasyMock and the Dynamic Mock API both > > generate Mock objects > > at runtime (using Dynamic Proxies). You should > > really have a look at > > www.mockobjects.com or wwww.easymock.org > > > > -Vincent > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > From: Prabodh Goel [mailto:prabodhgoel@;yahoo.com] > > > Sent: 07 November 2002 04:26 > > > To: Cactus Users List > > > Subject: RE: Junit vs JUnitDoclet vs Jtest > > > > > > > > > Hi Vincent > > > > > > Thanks for the help. Will Mock Objects be able to > > > generate Test class and methods framework like in > > > JUnitDoclet. > > > Its actually very tedious to write evey single > > test > > > case using JUint and hence I thought of shifting > > to > > > JUnitDoclet (its free too!) > > > > > > regards, > > > Prabodh > > > --- Vincent Massol <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > Hi Prabodh, > > > > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > > > From: Prabodh Goel > > [mailto:prabodhgoel@;yahoo.com] > > > > > Sent: 06 November 2002 05:52 > > > > > To: Cactus Users List > > > > > Subject: RE: Junit vs JUnitDoclet vs Jtest > > > > > > > > > > Hi Eric, > > > > > > > > > > I am interested in testing only core Java. > > > > > > > > Then you should use Mock Objects. I highly > > recommend > > > > either EasyMock or > > > > the Dynamic Mock API from www.mockobjects.com. > > > > > > > > However, I hope you do realize that when it > > comes to > > > > testing J2EE > > > > applications, testing the code is only half of > > the > > > > job. Testing the > > > > configuration and setup is the other half. > > Cactus > > > > was built to address > > > > this requirement: it tests the code at the > > method > > > > level but in the > > > > context of its configuration/setup to ensure the > > > > application works (and > > > > not that the code works). > > > > > > > > As we progress towards containers containing > > more > > > > services and as > > > > progress towards L4G tools, the cost of building > > an > > > > application is > > > > shifting more and more towards integration (and > > thus > > > > configuration), > > > > i.e. configuration that is not in the code. > > > > > > > > Cheers, > > > > -Vincent > > > > > > > > > > > > > > - Prabodh > > > > > > > > > > --- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > > > > > I think it all depends on what kinds of > > testing > > > > you > > > > > > want.. any one test > > > > > > tool won't work.. I use Junit, DbUnit, > > WebTest, > > > > and > > > > > > Cactus, all depending > > > > > > on what parts of my app I am testing... > > > > > > > > > > > > Eric > > > > > > > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > > > > From: Prabodh Goel > > > > [mailto:prabodhgoel@;yahoo.com] > > > > > > Sent: Tuesday, November 05, 2002 11:30 PM > > > > > > To: Cactus Users List > > > > > > Subject: Junit vs JUnitDoclet vs Jtest > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Hi All > > > > > > > > > > > > I am evaluating which unit testing method I > > > > should > > > > > > use > > > > > > from Quality Engg. perspective. > > > > > > > > > > > > a. Unit test should have 100% code coverage > > > > > > b. I should be able to compile all the unit > > > > tests > > > > > > (given by developers) at module level as > > well as > > > > a > > > > > > whole. > > > > > > > > > > > > I am evaluating JUnit, JUnitDoclet and > > Jtest. > > > > > > > > > > > > Has anyone used all of these ? If yes, > > please > > > > let me > > > > > > know which one will be able satisfy both the > > > > > > conditions > > > > > > Do I need JProbe for code coverage ? > > > > > > > > > > > > TIA > > > > > > prabodh > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > __________________________________________________ > > > > > > Do you Yahoo!? > > > > > > HotJobs - Search new jobs daily now > > > > > > http://hotjobs.yahoo.com/ > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: > > > > > > > > > > > > <mailto:cactus-user-unsubscribe@;jakarta.apache.org> > > > > > > For additional commands, e-mail: > > > > > > <mailto:cactus-user-help@;jakarta.apache.org> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > __________________________________________________ > > > > > Do you Yahoo!? > > > > > HotJobs - Search new jobs daily now > > > > > http://hotjobs.yahoo.com/ > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:cactus-user- > > > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > > > For additional commands, e-mail: > > > > <mailto:cactus-user- > > > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: > > > > > > <mailto:cactus-user-unsubscribe@;jakarta.apache.org> > > > > For additional commands, e-mail: > > > > <mailto:cactus-user-help@;jakarta.apache.org> > > > > > > > > > > > > > __________________________________________________ > > > Do you Yahoo!? > > > U2 on LAUNCH - Exclusive greatest hits videos > > > http://launch.yahoo.com/u2 > > > > > > -- > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:cactus-user- > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > For additional commands, e-mail: > > <mailto:cactus-user- > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > > > > > === message truncated === > > > __________________________________________________ > Do you Yahoo!? > U2 on LAUNCH - Exclusive greatest hits videos > http://launch.yahoo.com/u2 > > -- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:cactus-user-unsubscribe@;jakarta.apache.org> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:cactus-user-help@;jakarta.apache.org> -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:cactus-user-unsubscribe@;jakarta.apache.org> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:cactus-user-help@;jakarta.apache.org>
