Yep, I had the same thought. Also cactus could check for the static keyword in testXXX. Just need to find some time. If anyone wants to submit a patch...
Thanks -Vincent > -----Original Message----- > From: J. B. Rainsberger [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: 05 March 2004 23:50 > To: Cactus Users List > Subject: Cactus/test name is null > > Ron Roth wrote: > > > That did the trick. Thanks very much to both of you. > > It points out a potential defect in Cactus, though. When the test name > is null, JUnit usually pukes; but in this case, it looks like a test > failure. Vince... maybe it's worth changing Cactus so that it blows up > the same way that JUnit does when the test name is null. > -- > J. B. Rainsberger, > Diaspar Software Services > http://www.diasparsoftware.com :: +1 416 791-8603 > Let's write software that people understand > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
