FYI, I've just unsubscribed that address. -Vincent
> -----Original Message----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: 14 May 2004 15:36 > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Autoreply: RE: Jetty integration - running individual tests > > Hello, > > Due to the increased volume of SPAM this mailbox has been closed. > > Please contact us via http://www.directxtras.com/ContactUS.asp > > We apology for the inconvenience. > > Best Regards, > -- > The DirectXtras Team > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > DirectXtras - Xtra Power for Director and Authorware - > http://www.directxtras.com > Sites with something to say - http://www.SpeaksForItself.com > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > > Your message reads: > > Received: from mail.apache.org (unverified [209.237.227.199]) by > mail2.intermedia.net > (Rockliffe SMTPRA 4.5.6) with SMTP id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; > Fri, 14 May 2004 06:36:15 -0700 > Received: (qmail 95313 invoked by uid 500); 14 May 2004 13:36:13 -0000 > Mailing-List: contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]; run by ezmlm > Precedence: bulk > List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > List-Subscribe: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > List-Help: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > List-Post: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > List-Id: "Cactus Users List" <cactus-user.jakarta.apache.org> > Reply-To: "Cactus Users List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Delivered-To: mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Received: (qmail 95142 invoked by uid 98); 14 May 2004 13:36:12 -0000 > Received: from [EMAIL PROTECTED] by hermes.apache.org by uid 82 with > qmail-scanner-1.20 > (clamuko: 0.70. Clear:RC:0(195.46.220.208):. > Processed in 0.02971 secs); 14 May 2004 13:36:12 -0000 > X-Qmail-Scanner-Mail-From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] via hermes.apache.org > X-Qmail-Scanner: 1.20 (Clear:RC:0(195.46.220.208):. Processed in 0.02971 > secs) > Received: from unknown (HELO pm-mx.noos.fr) (195.46.220.208) > by hermes.apache.org with SMTP; 14 May 2004 13:36:11 -0000 > Received: from noos.fr (pm-mnet4.mgn.net [195.46.220.217]) > by pm-mx.noos.fr (Postfix) with SMTP id D198026873 > for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Fri, 14 May 2004 15:35:58 > +0200 (MEST) > X-Mailbox-Line: From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri May 14 15:35:58 2004 > Received: from vma (vma [195.132.245.195]) > by pm-mnet4.mgn.net with ESMTP; > Fri, 14 May 2004 15:35:58 (MEST) > From: "Vincent Massol" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: "'Cactus Users List'" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: RE: Jetty integration - running individual tests > Date: Fri, 14 May 2004 15:36:24 +0200 > Organization: Pivolis > Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > MIME-Version: 1.0 > Content-Type: text/plain; > charset="US-ASCII" > Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit > X-Priority: 3 (Normal) > X-MSMail-Priority: Normal > X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook, Build 10.0.4024 > In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1409 > Importance: Normal > X-Spam-Rating: hermes.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N > > Hi Chris, > > I've just committed the change in Cactus CVS HEAD. JettyTestSetup now > checks if jetty is already started. If so, it doesn't start it again nor > does it stop it. > > This way you can have: > > - MyTestCase1 with a suite() method > - MyTestCaseN with a suite() method > - TestAll which adds all MyTestCaseN classes > > and be able to execute each of them with no change. > > I'll release a 1.7dev nightly build sometime this week end. > > Thanks > -Vincent > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Chris May [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Sent: 11 May 2004 09:53 > > To: Cactus Users List > > Subject: Re: Jetty integration - running individual tests > > > > > > On 10 May 2004, at 20:04, Vincent Massol wrote: > > > > > I'd be happy to change the way it works if you can find a solution. > > > > > > Then only solution I can think of for now is for you to have a > suite() > > > method in each of your test case classe. Then we could modify the > > > existing JettyTestSetup class to not start/stop the server if it's > > > already running. Would that do it for you? > > > > > > > That would certainly improve things performance-wise. The ability to > > run a single test method from the IDE is nice, but it's a long way off > > essential, and this would seem to solve every other issue that I have. > > > > > > Many thanks. > > > > Chris > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
