Hi Vincent, In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Thu, 11 Nov 2004 14:03:04 +0100, "Vincent Massol" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: vmassol> What strategy would you like us to follow to align the behaviors of vmassol> FilterTestCase and ServletTestCase?
To align... Is this means that FilterTestCase and ServletTestCase should have same behavior of its default setAutomateSession()? If so, I think it's impossible without breaking existing TestCases. Of cource, it might be more trifling problem than I think. Why don't we wait for reactions from other users of this list? # How do you think, Pedro? vmassol> BTW, do you have any idea why I decided to enable session creation by vmassol> default for ServletTestCase? I can't recall... ;-) I'm not sure since it had already been so when I used Cactus for the first time. But I can guess some: 1. Servlet uses a session object in many cases, then, it's user friendly if the session object is prepared by default. 2. if method under test uses a session object, a TestCase 'there is no session object available' is needed only once, however, there are other many 'when the session object has XYZ' TestCases. 3. if method under test does not use any session object, the default behavior of the session creation can not be a problem. Regards, ---- Kazuhito SUGURI mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
