Hi Pandu,

> -----Original Message-----
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: vendredi 28 janvier 2005 20:20
> To: Cactus Users List
> Cc: 'Cactus Users List'; 'Venu Sunil Boyireddy'
> Subject: RE: Maintaing session between 2 cactus test cases.
> 
> Maintaining session between some tests will help us also, since we have to
> keep some things in session. These items are valid for the entire session.
> What we notice that in our unit tests when we run them like they should be
> , each test goes to the db every time to keep those needed items in
> session. This creates lots of overhead for us. I guess one way would to
> use
> mock objects for that . Any suggestions Vincent ??

Exactly. I would create most of my tests in isolation from the database
(possibly using mocks) and then have a few integration/functional tests.

-Vincent

> Regards
> Pandu
> 
> 
> |---------+---------------------------->
> |         |           "Vincent Massol" |
> |         |           <[EMAIL PROTECTED]|
> |         |           com>             |
> |         |                            |
> |         |           01/28/2005 01:06 |
> |         |           PM               |
> |         |           Please respond to|
> |         |           "Cactus Users    |
> |         |           List"            |
> |---------+---------------------------->
>   >-----------------------------------------------------------------------
> ---------------------------------------|
>   |
> |
>   |       To:       "'Venu Sunil Boyireddy'" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
> "'Cactus Users List'"                       |
>   |        <[email protected]>
> |
>   |       cc:
> |
>   |       Subject:  RE: Maintaing session between 2 cactus test cases.
> |
>   >-----------------------------------------------------------------------
> ---------------------------------------|
> 
> 
> 
> 
> Hi Sunil,
> 
> I've taken some time to write a test to prove that it works. Here it is:
> 
> public class TestHttpSession extends ServletTestCase
> {
>     private HttpSessionCookie sessionCookie;
>     private TestHttpSession dependentTest;
> 
>     public TestHttpSession(String name)
>     {
>         super(name);
>     }
> 
>     public TestHttpSession(String name, TestHttpSession test)
>     {
>         super(name);
>         this.dependentTest = test;
>     }
> 
>     public static Test suite()
>     {
>         TestSuite suite = new TestSuite();
> 
>         TestHttpSession test = new
> TestHttpSession("testDependentTestUsingSession");
>         suite.addTest(test);
>         suite.addTest(new
> TestHttpSession("testDependentTestUsingSession2",
> test));
> 
>         return suite;
>     }
> 
>     public void beginDependentTestUsingSession(WebRequest theRequest)
>     {
>         this.sessionCookie = theRequest.getSessionCookie();
>         assertNotNull("Session cookie should not be null", sessionCookie);
>         theRequest.addCookie(sessionCookie);
>         System.out.println("cookie = " + this.sessionCookie);
>     }
> 
>     public void testDependentTestUsingSession()
>     {
>         session.setAttribute("dependentTestId", "dependentTestValue");
>     }
> 
>     public void beginDependentTestUsingSession2(WebRequest theRequest)
>     {
>         assertNotNull(this.dependentTest.sessionCookie);
>         theRequest.addCookie(this.dependentTest.sessionCookie);
>     }
> 
>     public void testDependentTestUsingSession2()
>     {
>         assertEquals("dependentTestValue",
> session.getAttribute("dependentTestId"));
>     }
> }
> 
> Please note that making test dependent on each other is strongly
> discouraged
> as this is not unit testing. I just wanted to show you it is possible but
> I
> would advise you to set up the session with the right value for each test.
> 
> Thanks
> -Vincent
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Venu Sunil Boyireddy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Sent: vendredi 28 janvier 2005 17:33
> > To: Cactus Users List
> > Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Subject: RE: Maintaing session between 2 cactus test cases.
> >
> > Hi Vincent,
> >
> > I have used the other also.
> >
> >
> >
> >            theRequest.setAutomaticSession(false);
> >       HttpSessionCookie sessionCookie = theRequest.getSessionCookie();
> >       assertNotNull("Session cookie should not be null", sessionCookie);
> >            theRequest.addCookie(sessionCookie);
> >
> > these are the entries in my beginXXX method. But still I was getting new
> > session every time.
> >
> > I tested AbstractWebTestController.java. I found it still creating new
> > session before every test case?
> >
> > Is cactus any where removing sessions?
> >
> > Any help is greatly appreciated.
> >
> > Thanks and Regards
> >
> > Sunil
> >
> >
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Vincent Massol [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Sent: Thursday, January 27, 2005 7:17 PM
> > To: Venu Sunil Boyireddy; 'Cactus Users List'
> > Subject: RE: Maintaing session between 2 cactus test cases.
> >
> >
> > Hi Sunil,
> >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: Venu Sunil Boyireddy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > Sent: jeudi 27 janvier 2005 14:29
> > > To: Cactus Users List
> > > Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > Subject: RE: Maintaing session between 2 cactus test cases.
> > >
> > > Hi Vincent,
> > >
> > > Thanks for your help.
> > > I'm using cactus, strutsTest to test my action classes. Its working
> fine
> > > with individual Action Clases.
> > >
> > > We have a generic test case which takes parameters such as Action
> name,
> > > Request parameters, actionforward Name, action forward path etc. from
> > xml
> > > file and test that action class.
> > >
> > > So, with this I am able to test multiple actions. And Thanks for your
> > help
> > > in getting this work done.
> > >
> > > But, to complete testing our functionality I need to test 3 action
> > > classes.
> > > As I'm using generic Testcase which tests one action class at a time,
> I
> > > need
> > > to run 3 testcases (or the generic test case thrice with different
> > > parameters) to test these action classes. For this I need session
> alive
> > in
> > > between, so first action class keep some values in session and the
> other
> > > Action classes needs. So, All these 3 test cases needs to share same
> > > session.
> > >
> > > Hope I'm clear in explaining my problem.
> >
> > Yes, that's what I had understood.
> >
> > >
> > > I tried with WebRequest.setAutomaticSession(false). that didn't work.
> >
> > Have you tried the second point I mentioned below?
> >
> > Thanks
> > -Vincent
> >
> > >
> > > Any help is greatly appreciated.
> > >
> > > Thanks and Regards
> > >
> > > Sunil
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: Vincent Massol [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > Sent: Wednesday, January 26, 2005 7:22 PM
> > > To: [email protected]
> > > Subject: RE: Maintaing session between 2 cactus test cases.
> > >
> > >
> > > Hi Sunil,
> > >
> > > - You can use WebRequest.setAutomaticSession(false) to tell Cactus not
> > to
> > > create a new HTTP session, but that may or may not help you.
> > >
> > > - You can also use WebRequest.getSessionCookie() if you wish to get
> the
> > > session cookie created in order to reuse it in another test
> > >
> > > See http://tinyurl.com/4qeeb for the test file used by Cactus to test
> > > these
> > > features.
> > >
> > > -Vincent
> > >
> > > > -----Original Message-----
> > > > From: Venu Sunil Boyireddy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > > Sent: lundi 24 janvier 2005 06:53
> > > > To: [email protected]; [email protected]
> > > > Subject: Maintaing session between 2 cactus test cases.
> > > >
> > > > Hi,
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > I have a requirement where I need to maintain the session alive
> > between
> > > > the
> > > > test cases.
> > > >
> > > > How can I do it. I know that cactus wont support it by default as
> its
> > a
> > > > unit
> > > > test framework.
> > > >
> > > > Any help is greatly appreciated.
> > > >
> > > > Thanks in advance.
> > > >
> > > > Sunil
> > > >
> > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------
> -
> > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >
> >
> >
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 
> 
> 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 
> 
> 
> 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]





---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to