Keith Mitchell wrote: > > Jan Damborsky wrote: >> [...]
>> I have tried to go with this solutions, since using >> splitlines() looks like better approach, but I have >> realized that I still need to process last line separately, >> since we want to keep it for later processing >> only if it is incomplete. Otherwise, we want to log it >> immediately. The final solution then was not so elegant, >> so if you agree, at this point I would go with the original >> approach. > > That's fine by me. I was just throwing the suggestion out there. > Thanks for taking the time to consider it. Understood - thank you very much for spending your time on this. Jan
