Thanks Jan for the explanation. Am I correct in my assumption that I 
should test test_ti with actual storage? Or is the simulation output 
acceptable?
thx,
ginnie


On 09/15/08 08:08, jan damborsky wrote:
> Hi Ginnie,
>
> I concur with Sundar. I have just couple of comments -
> please see in line.
>
> Thank you very much for testing this !
> Jan
>
>
> Virginia Wray wrote:
>>
>> Hi -
>>
>> I've attached a text file with the results of tests I ran on the sparc
>> microroot. I put them in a text file, but I can put them in another
>> format...just let me know.
>> There are four test scenarios:
>> 1. Internal devices only, comprised of two hard drives and a DVD reader
>> 2.  No.1, plus an external DVD R/W
>> 3.  No.1, plus a USB
>> 4. No.1, plus external DVD R/W and USB
>>
>> I ran format and rmformat and collected the results. I also  ran iostat
>> -en on test 2, just to see what the output looked like.  I then ran
>> various incantations of test_td:
>> 1. ./test_td -v -d
>> 2. ./test_td -d
>> 3. ./test_td -s all
>> 4. ./test_td -v -s all
>> 5. ./test_td -v -d -s all
>>
>> The -s output is more accurate than the -d output. The -s output "# of
>> blocks" is identical to the format output, while the -d is differs a 
>> bit.
>
> This is correct. # of blocks reported for '-d' case refers to total 
> number
> of blocks on the disk. Since there are some sectors reserved (2 
> cylinders)
> and size of slices is rounded to cylinders, size of slice 2 occupies 
> slightly
> less space.
> You could check with 'iostat -En' for total number of disk sectors. 
> This number
> should equal to the one reported for '-d'.
>
>> The size in MB reported for both -s and -d differe slightly from each
>> other and from the format output.
>>
>> The DVDd (both internal and external) are not picked up by the test_td
>> command. Should they be? There was media in the external drive.
>
> This is expected behavior. For now, TD filters out floppy as well as
> all DVD/CD drives, since they are not considered to be valid targets
> for installation at time of being.
>
>
>>
>> The output for the USB in this set of tests is consistent for both the
>> rmformat output and the test_td command.
>>
>> Let me know if there is further testing with test_td that needs to be 
>> done.
>>
>> I'm now looking at test_ti. I've solved the library error (my fault).
>> I'm in the process of getting some attached storage onto the machine. I
>> can't run anything but simulations because there isn't any free space
>> without attaching something. All of the simulations pass no matter what
>> I type in....I was wondering if that's ok, or if the simulations should
>> fail.
>
> That behavior is fine - simulation doesn't invoke real commands, so
> it is no-op in most of the cases and is expected not to fail.
>
>> I've been working with Geoffrey (sys admin). He and I should have
>> that today, I think.
>>
>> thx,
>>
>>
>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> caiman-discuss mailing list
>> caiman-discuss at opensolaris.org
>> http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/caiman-discuss
>


-- 
                                
        Ginnie 
    
    

  
                
      


Reply via email to