Sorry that should have been 3542 not 3254...

>>> I filed 2 bugs, http://defect.opensolaris.org/bz/show_bug.cgi?id=4499
>>> and http://defect.opensolaris.org/bz/show_bug.cgi?id=4500 for the
>>> problem.
>> Do these solve the problems seen in 3254 as well or is there more to it then 
>> what we've talked about here? It appears from the bug reports that 3254 was 
>> split into 4499 and 4500 and should be closed when these are fixed. Does 
>> that 
>> sound correct?
> Yes, 3542 can be recognized as too bugs: 4499 and 4500.
> 
> Regards,
> 
> Jedy

Reply via email to