Anil Gulecha wrote:
> On 10/19/07, Glenn Lagasse <glenn.lagasse at sun.com> wrote:
>> Hey Sanjay,
>>
>> * Sanjay Nadkarni (Sanjay.Nadkarni at sun.com) wrote:
>>> One of the things I am trying to figure out the number of options a user
>>> should have to boot OpenSolaris.  This of course directly translates to
>>> the number of grub entries.    Currently,  the entry will boot the
>>> system  in the best available mode, i.e if your hardware supports  ISA64
>>> then opensolaris will boot into a 64 bit mode.   However, should  should
>>> there be an explicit entry for booting into 32 bit mode ?  (For October
>>> prototype there is no safe mode boot. )  Should there be a no-acpi based
>>> boot ?
>>>
>>> Your thoughts are welcome.
>> I think we probably want to keep things simple.  Too many choices are
>> likely to confuse.  But a few choices might not be a bad idea.  I don't
>> know that we need an explicit 32 bit entry.  Have we ever seen an issue
>> where the auto-detection failed?  A non-acpi entry might be a good idea
>> given the horrible state of acpi support on most consumer grade hardware
>> we've seen.
>>
> Hi,
> 
> Regarding the many options view, we can keep them all and still hide
> them from the user. I know that fedora core uses a grub feature that
> does not display the list but allows for a default selection. I found
> a screenshot here
> (http://www.homelandstupidity.us/images/FC3/FC3-037.png). I haven't
> tried the later versions of fedora, so dont know if they do it
> similarly too, and if the grub stuff went upstream.
> 

I'd guess that's done just by using the hiddenmenu command.

http://www.gnu.org/software/grub/manual/grub.html#hiddenmenu

 > We could default to the normal startup in indiana this way in say 3
 > seconds. All the other options could be viewed by canceling the
 > default start and viewing the other options (acpi/ 32 bit/ ..)
 >

That would be decent, I think.

Dave

> Regards
> Anil
> _______________________________________________
> caiman-discuss mailing list
> caiman-discuss at opensolaris.org
> http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/caiman-discuss


Reply via email to