Evan Layton wrote: > >> >> Also, let's not forget that it's not just AI that we might want to do >> this with; the various interactive installers are likely to grow >> options (such as installing from a repository) which make this an >> issue for them, too. > > Right, Ethan also mentioned that this should really say "package based > installs" not AI. > Should it just be "package based installs"? Or should it be even more general to include installs where the bits to install is not bundled together with the installer? Eg: the installer could be installing from some sort of archive that sits in the network somewhere.
--Karen
