Hi Ethan.
Ethan Quach wrote:
>
>
> Sarah Jelinek wrote:
>> Jack Schwartz wrote:
>>>
>>> Instead, we talked about having similar sections for the same
>>> functionality (e.g. targets) in different project manifests (e.g. DC
>>> and AI). Manifest schemas for different projects can be put
>>> together in a modular fashion using separate subschemas for
>>> different parts. So, for example, assuming each project had the
>>> same "target" input requirements, there could be a subschema for
>>> targets. I have verified that the subschema concept works for RelaxNG.
>>>
>> Ok, yes, I remember this now :-).
>
> So is this subschema thing a matter of organization in our source
> code? ... not in delivered schemas right?
No, it is in how schemas are delivered. It's kind of like including a
header file in another header file. When schema file 1 references
schema file 2, it is like the contents of file 2 is directly inside file 1.
Thanks,
Jack
>
>
> -ethan
>
>
