Ethan,

> Tim,
> 
> Fix lines 30 and 75; they cause line overflows.

So a character in the 67th column creates an overflow? How is that determined?

> 
> Can you remove the change at line 4.  I think having this in
> one place in the DESCRIPTION section is sufficient.
> 

done.

Thanks
Tim

> 
> thanks,
> -ethan
> 
> 
> Tim Knitter wrote:
>> Ethan,
>>
>>  
>>> Tim,
>>>
>>> One more comment in beadm.1m.txt
>>>
>>> 41 - Do we really need this line here?   Its not a special individual
>>>     
>>
>> No. It's nuked.
>>
>> Thanks
>> Tim
>>
>>  
>>> operation, so why are we highlighting it?  When 1833 gets fixed and
>>> we have something like a "beadm description ... "  or whatever
>>> subcommand, that would be something we'd add to this list.
>>>
>>>
>>> thanks,
>>> -ethan
>>>
>>>
>>> Tim Knitter wrote:
>>>    
>>>> Ethan Quach wrote:
>>>>  
>>>>      
>>>>> Ethan Quach wrote:
>>>>>           
>>>>>> Tim Knitter wrote:
>>>>>>  
>>>>>>               
>>>>>>> Ethan Quach wrote:
>>>>>>>                      
>>>>>>>> Tim,
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> The code changes look fine.  My only comment is on the man page.
>>>>>>>> Ideally, I'd rather us not mention the use of 'description' as 
>>>>>>>> being used
>>>>>>>> as the title in the grub menu at all if possible.  ~But~ if this 
>>>>>>>> *is* something
>>>>>>>> we do want to publicize, then it should be stated as a side note 
>>>>>>>> rather than
>>>>>>>> the only use of 'description'.  i.e. something like:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>    -d description        Create a new BE with a description
>>>>>>>>                          associated with it.  This description
>>>>>>>>                          is also used as the title for this BE's
>>>>>>>>                          entry in the GRUB menu.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>                               
>>>>>>> I like this better than the example I passed back to Barbara 
>>>>>>> earlier with the addition of the last sentence I added.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> "If a description is not supplied, beName will be used as the 
>>>>>>> entry in the GRUB menu."
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>                         
>>>>>> Hmm, could we instead move the last two sentences out into the main
>>>>>> beadm create paragraph above?
>>>>>>                   
>>>>> .. the reason for this request is that with this additional 
>>>>> sentence, seems like
>>>>> we're starting to describe behavior outside of what's just inherent 
>>>>> for the option.
>>>>>
>>>>>             
>>>> Agreed. Webrev updated.
>>>>
>>>> Thanks
>>>> Tim
>>>>
>>>>  
>>>>      
>>>>> -ethan
>>>>>
>>>>>           
>>>>>> thanks,
>>>>>> -ethan
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>  
>>>>>>               
>>>>>>>                      
>>>>>>>> Also, could you add an Example to show how to quote the description
>>>>>>>> text on the command line.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>                               
>>>>>>> Done.
>>>>>>> See updated webrev.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Thanks
>>>>>>> Tim
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>                      
>>>>>>>> thanks,
>>>>>>>> -ethan
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Tim Knitter wrote:
>>>>>>>>                            
>>>>>>>>> In order to test the functionality that this code exposes, 
>>>>>>>>> beadm has also been
>>>>>>>>> modified to make use of the new interface in libbe.c and is 
>>>>>>>>> being addressed by
>>>>>>>>> this bug. A [-d description] opt & arg is beaing added to the 
>>>>>>>>> beadm usage for create as follows:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> beadm create [-a] [-d description] [-e non-activeBeName | 
>>>>>>>>> beName at snapshot]
>>>>>>>>>     [-o property=value] ... [-p zpool] beName
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Please see the updated webrev that includes the changes to make 
>>>>>>>>> the above happen.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> These changes have been successfully tested on bld99.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Thanks
>>>>>>>>> Tim
>>>>>>>>>  
>>>>>>>>> Tim Knitter wrote:
>>>>>>>>>  
>>>>>>>>>                                  
>>>>>>>>>> Caimaniacs,
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Please review the following simple change:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> 4054 beCopy() needs to take parameter for BE description
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> WR: http://cr.opensolaris.org/~tsk/4054/
>>>>>>>>>> B:  http://defect.opensolaris.org/bz/show_bug.cgi?id=4054
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> This has been tested on bld99 with pkg(1) and beadm(1M).
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Thanks
>>>>>>>>>> Tim
>>>>>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>>>>>> caiman-discuss mailing list
>>>>>>>>>> caiman-discuss at opensolaris.org
>>>>>>>>>> http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/caiman-discuss
>>>>>>>>>>                                               
>>>>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>>>>> caiman-discuss mailing list
>>>>>>>>> caiman-discuss at opensolaris.org
>>>>>>>>> http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/caiman-discuss
>>>>>>>>>                                       
>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>> caiman-discuss mailing list
>>>>>> caiman-discuss at opensolaris.org
>>>>>> http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/caiman-discuss
>>>>>>                   
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> caiman-discuss mailing list
>>>> caiman-discuss at opensolaris.org
>>>> http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/caiman-discuss
>>>>         
>> _______________________________________________
>> caiman-discuss mailing list
>> caiman-discuss at opensolaris.org
>> http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/caiman-discuss
>>   

Reply via email to