Ethan Quach wrote: ... > > Dynamically creating new, arbitrarily named property groups for an > SMF service? Is this really done by any other SMF services or even > recommended? >
I believe NWAM phase 1 will be doing something along those lines, but my memory may be faulty on this point. It's not recommended to store properties that change at a high transaction rate; this situation would appear to be a fairly normal case of infrequently-changing configuration properties. Dave
